PROSTATE PATHOLOGY
NORMAL
Anatomy
Weight: 30-40g
Basal portion located beneath bladder neck
Apex above urogenital diaphragm
Skeletal muscle at apex extends into prostateà glands admixed with skeletal muscles does not mean neoplastic or extraprostatic extension
Rectum and prostate separated by thin fascia
3 cell types
Secretory: PSA, PAP
Basal: HMK (cytoplasmic), p16 (nuclear)
NE:
IHC markers:
HMK (34βe12): basal cells
P63: basal cells
PSA: prostatic specific Ag
PAP: prostatic acid phosphatase
AMA CoA racemase (alpha methyl acyl)
AMACR+ conditions
Cancer
HGPIN
Foci of adenosis
Whats are zones?
Transition zone: central periurethral, containing proximal urethra
Central zone: back of transition zone, toward back of prostate, contains ejaculatory ducts
Peripheral zone: cup-shaped, supports TZ and CZ
PROSTATITIS
Name types*
Acute bacterial
Chronic bacterial
Chronic abacterial
Granulomatous
Compare acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis
| Acute bact | Chronic bact | Chronic abact (no1) |
| Fever, dysuria, tender prostate | Asymptomatic or vague discomfort with dysuria | Same as chronic bacterial |
| KEEPS
Retrograde, lymphatics, BV, catheterization, surgeries |
KEEPS
Recurrent UTI (cystitis, urethritis)* by same bug |
No history of recurrent UTI* |
| Clinical features and urine culture | Leucocytes and positive cultures in expressed prostatic secretions | >10 leukocytes/HPF in expressed prostatic secretions but negative culture |
| Edema
Sheets of PMN in parenchyma and lumens Abscess Necrosis |
Must have lymphoid aggregates, numerous plasma cells, macrophages and PMN*
Also requires clinical symptoms of chronic prostatitis*[1] |
|
Don’t sign out acute or chronic prostatitis; just call acute or chronic inflammation
GRANULOMATOUS INFLAMMATION
Ddx of granulomatous inflammation
Nonspecific granulomatous prostatitis
Post-biopsy granuloma
Post-BCG therapy (no1): can be necrotizing, bug morphology indistinguishable as TB. Rare cases of dissemination reported
TB
Allergic granulomatous prostatitis
6. Mycotic prostatitis: nearly all in immunocompromised. Blastomycosis, coccidiomycosis, Cryptococcus,…
7. Sarcoidosis
NONSPECIFIC GRANULOMATOUS PROSTATITIS
Etio? Infectious?
Ruptured acinus results in FB reaction to prostatic secretions and contents
Not infectious
Micro
Lobular infiltrate of foamy macrophages, lymphocytes, plasma cells, granulomas with giants (next to ruptured acini)
Differentiate epithelioid histiocytes from cancer
| Prostatitis | Adenocarcinoma |
| Plasma cells, eosinophils, PMN | No |
| CD68 | CK+ |
POST-BIOPSY GRANULOMA
Micro
Large central fibrinoid necrosis surrounded by palisading epithelioid histiocytes
ALLERGIC GRANULOMATOUS PROSTATITIS
Micro
Necrobiotic granulomas surrounded by many eosinophils
OTHER THINGS TO WATCH OUT FOR
Malakoplakia
Amyloidosis: corpora amylacea also stains for Congo Red?
Calculi: from calcification of corpora amylacea
Cysts
Melanocytic lesions such as melanosis and blue nevi
Mucous gland metaplasia: goblet cells with tiny basal nuclei, in small nests up to 10 cells
BPH
Reliable
Poor clinicopathologic correlation. Only 50% of histology have large prostate. Only 50% of large prostate have ssx.
Mechanism
5a-reductase type 2à DHT (dihydrotestosterone)à prostate growthà obstruction
Alpha1-adrenoreceptor in prostatic stromaà SM contractionà obstruction
Locations of BPH nodules
Periurethral (transitional zone)
Slit-like urethral orifice
What’s earliest change?
Early: stromal hyperplasia (SM with fibrous tissue)
Mixture of glands and fibromuscular stromal components
Cystic dilation, papillary infolding
2 layers: columnar secretory + cuboidal basal
Infarcts, squamous metaplasiaà reactive change in proximity can mimic cancer
How to diagnose on needle biopsy?
You should not diagnose BPH but rather benign prostatic tissue because limited sampling and needle does not reach transition zone.
Differentiate reactive changes secondary to infarction from cancer
Reactive: localized, next to infarct
PIN
Define***
Benign architecture but malignant cytology
LGPIN vs HGPIN
| LGPIN | HGPIN |
| Normal architecture
Papillae Undulating luminal surfaces |
|
| No | Nucleoli visible at 20x (not required if significant pleomorphism) |
| Micro
Slightly enlarged nuclei Stratification |
Micro
Large nuclei Dark (sometimes vesicular) Overlapping nuclei Amphophilic cytoplasm Epithelial HP High N/C Lower nuclear grade as getting toward center (grading based on cells immediately against BM) Stratification |
| Basal layer fragmented but present | |
| Variants
Tufting (no1) Micropapillary Cribriform |
|
Incidence of HGPIN in needle?
5% (same as ASAP)
Clinical significance of HGPIN on needle biopsy?
Cancer found in 1/3 of subsequent biopsy)à must have repeat biopsy of entire prostate (not directed biopsy as in ASAP) in 12-24 months
What if you find HGPIN on TURP?
Must submit rest of prostatic chips!
Clinical significance unclear. Often no further workup in elderly but not true in younger men
% of HGPIN evolving toward cancer?
Unknown (unlike in cervix). Therefore, HGPIN can’t not be called premalignant until we know its natural history
HGPIN vs cancer
| HGPIN | Cancer |
| No | True papillae (FV core) |
| Normal architecture | Too small or too crowded glands to be benign |
| Cribriforming without back-to-back glands | Cribriforming with back-to-back glands |
| Extensive comedonecrosis | |
| No basal layer | |
| HGPIN | CCCH |
| -Cribriform
-Clear cytoplasm -Nodular or infiltrative patterns |
|
| -Atypical nuclei | -Benign nuclei (key)
-Small nucleoli -Very prominent basal layer at periphery |
| HGPIN | Basal cell HP |
| Benign architecture (large glands, no crowding) | Small glands |
| Very rare | Solid nests sometimes |
| One | Distinct two population (blue and pink) |
| Perpendicular to BM | Nuclei parallel to BM |
| HMK- | HMK+ |
TUMORS
PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA
Demo
>50, black>white>Asian
Etiology
Unknown, maybe age, genetic and environmental (diet: fat, lycopenes, vitamins, selenium, soy products)
Familial in 10%à 1q abnormality
Name 5 variants of acinar carcinoma
Atrophic adenocarcinoma
Foamy gland carcinoma
Pseudohyperplastic adenocarcinoma (ddx PIN)
Clear cell adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiationà small cell NE carcinoma: typicall PSA-/PAP-, can secrete ACTH or ADH, often mixed with conventional adenocarcinoma
Tumors with squamous differentiation: rare
Signet ring adenocarcinomaà Gleason 5
Cribriform adenocarcinomaà Gleason 4
Sarcomatoid carcinomaà Gleason 5
Other variants
SCC
Mixed
Small cell carcinoma
Mucinous adenocarcinoma*: ³25% extracellular mucin, aggressiveà Gleason 4
Prostatic duct adenocarcinoma: originates from prostatic ducts (vs acini), resembles endometrioid carcinoma, PSA+/PAP+ (what about racemase?)à do not score because considered high-grade already
5 features favoring adenocarcinoma
↑N/C ratio
Large nucleoli
Mitoses
Cytoplasm
No lipofuscin pigment
Flat luminal border
Blue-tinged mucous
Crystalloids
Architecture
Mucinous fibroplasia (collagenous micronodules)
Glomerulations
Perineural invasion (must be circumferential)
Small glands, densely packed, single layer
Gross
Loss of spongy look of normal prostate
Firm and gritty grossly but difficult to discern on microscopy*
Criteria for minimal carcinoma
5% or 1mm
Rules
5% ruleà on the biopsy, drop lower grade if<5%, but keep if it is a higher grade
eg. 1) 98% 4+4, 2% 3
then = 4+4
eg. 2) 98% 4+4, 2% 5
then = 4+5
Assign a separate Gleason score to each dominant tumour nodule
Treatment decisions
Watchful waiting vs surgery vs radiation
Brachytherapy vs external beam therapy
Nerve-sparing, lymphadenectomy
When surgery is not feasible?
T3 or above but still can use radiation
When nerve-sparing surgery not feasible?
Ipsilateral nerve invasion???
Spread for prostatic cancer
Lymphatic: obsturatorà perivesical, hypogastric, iliac, presacral, para-aorticà cervical LN!
Hematogenous: bone (osteoblastic) (often after LN mets)
Any bony metastatic adenocarcinoma in men should be stained for PSA and PAP
4 pathways of spread to seminal vesicles?
Via periseminal vesicle soft tissue (no1)
Through ejaculatory ducts
Direct extension into seminal vesicle
Lymphovascular metastasis
Define seminal vesicle invasion
Through muscular coat of seminal vesicle
Curative for what stages?
T1-2, equivalent results for surgery and radiation
Radiation also useful for locally advanced tumor (>T2); hormonal therapy also added
Prognostic factors
Gleason*
Staging*
Extraprostatic extension
Margins of resection
4 tissues with cross-reactivity with PSA/PAP
Periurethral glands
Cystitis cystica, cystitis glandularis
Anal glands in men
Urachal remnants (PSA only)
What’s PSA? False elevation in what?
Product of prostatic epithelium, normally found in semen
4ng/mL cutoff between normal and abnormal unreliable
BPH, prostatitis, infarct, instrumentationà organ specific but not cancer specific*
20-40% of T1-2 prostatic cancer have PSA<4
Other modalities?*
PSA density: divided by volume
Age-dependent upper normal limit
PSA velocity
% of free PSA: free PSA/total PSAà lower value in cancer
Value of PSA and other related modalities?*
None can detect early cancer
But great for follow-up
Is prostatic capsule well-defined structure? Where normal glands can extend outside capsule?
No
Base of prostate
Extraprostatic extension. Are perineural invasion outside of prostate considered extraprostatic extension? Where does it occur most commonly?
Fat invasion (nearly 100% accurate)
Ganglionic invasion (about 90% as some ganglions can occur within prostate)
Protruding without capsular breaching (remember it’s a pseudocapsule)
Seminal vesicle invasion
Bladder invasion
No, extraprostatic perineural invasion is not extraprostatic extension (unless it’s large bundle of nerve)
Posterior and posterolateral aspects
Is tumors within “capsule” extraprostatic?
No
Why is it valuable to scan capsule smoothness at low power?
Extraprostatic extension often causes extensive desmoplasiaà irregular surface (good hint)
Is there any distance for calling positive margin?
No, even <1mm benign tissue separating inked margin is still negative margin (unless in colectomy)
When a needle biopsy should be considered unsatisfactory?
Minimal or no prostatic glandular or stromal tissue
Core containing only stroma is still satisfactory
Types of biopsy and risk?
Transrectal needle coreà no tumor seeding reported
Transperineal biopsyà tumor seeding reported
How to process needle cores? Why section thickness important? Why fixative important?
Intervening unstained slides important
Too thick sections result in artificial hyperchromasia and invisible nucleoli
Bouin’s may affect nucleolar prominence?
How to preserve potency? Where does bundle run?
Unilateral neurovascular bundle sparing enough
Posterolateral (surgeon will take as less tissue as possible from this area to spare nerve)
Which margin most commonly positive?
Apex
Any value in doing FS for margins?
Distal margin (apex) is questionable because surgeons often do their possible to take as much as possible
Proximal margin (bladder neck) has value being assessed in FS
To know whether there is any prostatic tissue leftà they scoop out gradually
LN to determine wether radical prostatectomy
Significance of intraductal TCC spread into prostate?
Usually found in TURP
Pagetoid or filling up ducts with central comedonecrosis
Requires radical prostatectomy (cystoprostatectomy) because not reachable by BCG
| Favoring cancer | Against cancer |
| Prominent nucleoli
Enlarged nuclei Dark Mitoses |
Atrophy (scanty cytoplasm) |
| Amphophilia (vs pale clear in normal)
Sharp luminal border Lack of lipofuscin |
R/O HGPIN
R/O PINATYP R/O adenosis |
| Blue-tinged mucin
Pink amorphous secretions Crystalloids (pink, geometric) |
Inflammation |
| Mucinous fibroplasia (collagenous micronodule)
Perineural invasion Glomerulations |
Corpora amylacea |
| Crowded small glands (too small or too crowded to be benign) between normal large glandsà important hint but must R/O adenosis
-No basal layer -Haphazard growthà especially useful for very LG tumor |
Cut levels
Compare with adjacent normal glands
Do IHC
Second opinion
Minimal carcinoma (<5%) always requires second opinion before signing out
ASAP: How to diagnose? How many glands required? What’s accepted incidence? What to report? What would clinician do? What does a second negative biopsy mean? What to do on resection specimen?
Ask for second opinion or send out for consultation and do IHC (negative basal cell staining in small acini does not confirm malignancy as benign glands can show some heterogeneity in staining) (but presence of basal cell staining probably indicate benign condition)
How many glands??? 3 glands???
Incidence: 5% in needle biopsy
Directed re-biopsy: 3 from ASAP site, 2 from adjacent sites, 1 elsewhere
Negative repeat biopsy does not R/O cancer because false negative rate as high as 25%
Racemase staining pattern???à still can be positive without being cancer because it can be HGPIN
Must sample thoroughly to find tumor
Atrophy |
Atrophic cancer |
| Open lumen
Crowded nuclei High N/C because of scanty cytoplasmà very basophilic at low power Call postatrophic hyperplasia when increased number of crowded atrophic glands (proliferating) Infiltrative |
|
| Macronucleoli | |
| Presence of adjacent nonatrophic cancer | |
| Use IHC | |
| Benign | Foamy gland cancer |
| Small bland nuclei | |
| Abundant foamy cyto | |
| Intraluminal pink secretions | |
| Use IHC | |
| Benign | Pseudohyperplastic |
| Larger glands | |
| Branching and papillae | |
| Too closely packed glands for HGPIN | |
| Nuclear atypia | |
| Use IHC | |
| SV/ED | Prostatic cancer |
| Lipofuscine pigments | |
| Degenerating atypia resembling radiation effect | Not as ugly looking |
| No mitoses | Mitoses |
| Well-formed glands | Rare to see cytoarchitectural paradox in cancer (truly ugly nuclei in well-formed glands) |
| Basal cells+ | No |
| PAP- (but PSA unreliable!) | PAP+ |
| TCC | Prostatic cancer |
| More pleomorphic | -Less pleomorphic even in PD tumors |
| Glassy cytoplasm | “Softer” foamy clear cytoplasm |
| Nests | Cords, cribriform glands |
| More prominent squamous differentiation | Rare |
| Necrosis | Unusual |
| Precursors | PIN |
| Inflamed | Lacks inflammation |
| PSA-/PAP-
|
PSA+/PAP+ (careful that PD prostate cancer can lose it) |
| CK7+/CK20+ | Neg |
| 34Be12+
Thrombomodulin+ Uroplakin+ |
Neg |
Adenosis vs prostatic cancer
| Adenosis | LG cancer |
| -Branching, irregular contour, papillae
-Back-to-back -Intraluminal crystalloids -Medium-sized nucleoli -Scattered single cells |
|
| Lobular configuration | Haphazard, infiltration at right angle to each other |
| Graduation transition from small pale glands to larger glands | May be purely small glands |
| Same appearance as adjacent normal glands | Different |
| Pale-clear cytoplasm | May be amphophilic |
| Blue mucin rare | Common |
| Corpora common | Rare |
| IHC (patchy basal cells) | Absent |
| Transition zone | Peripheral zone |
| Basal cell HP | Cancer |
| -Possible prominent nucleoli
-Rare mitoses possible -Large nuclei -Individual cell necrosis -Blue mucin |
|
| TZ | PZ |
| Nests or lumens | |
| Peripheral palisading | |
| Well-formed lamellar calcifications | Rare |
| Intracytoplasmic eosinophilis globules (unique) | No |
| Prominent stratification | No |
| HMK+ | No |
Name benign mimickers of cancer and location
| Clear cell cribriform hyperplasia | TURP>needle |
| Adenosis | TURP>needle |
| Seminal vesicles and ejaculatory ducts | Needle>TURP |
| Atrophy | Same |
| Cowper’s glands | Same |
| Granulomatous prostatitis | Same |
| Paraganglia | TURP>needle |
| Sclerosing adenosis | TURP>needle |
| Xanthoma | Needle>TURP |
| Signet ring cell lymphocytes | TURP only |
| Radiation atypia | Same |
| Basal cell HP | TURP>needle |
| Nephrogenic adenoma | TURP>needle |
| Verumontanum HP | Needle>TURP |
| Mesonephric HP | TURP only |
| Colonic mucosa | Needle only |
PROSTATE STAGING
T1 Clinically inapparent
T1a <5% (TURP)
T1b >5% (TURP)
T1c (Needle biopsy for high PSA)
T2 Confined to prostate
T2a <1/2 of lobe
T2b >1/2 of lobe
T2c Both lobes
T3a Capsule
T3b Seminal vesicle
T4 Bladder/rectum
N0
N1 regional nodes
M0
M1 distant mets
When to upstage?
TURP, needle coreà T1a-c
Clinically apparent and confined to prostateà T2
Sideà T2a-b vs T2c
Capsule invasion (not yet extraprostatic), seminal vesicle invasionà T3a-b
Organsà T4
When is pelvic lymphadenectomy necessary for staging?
Seems that most centers do this… Not sure
Some surgeons do not remove in low-risk patients
In what context do you see pelvic LN? How to process?
FS! If positive, surgery is aborted because non-curative if preoperative Gleason is 8-9. If lower Gleason, surgeons will still resect prostate because metastatic recurrence is quite late.
Submit in toto for FS!
How to stage a large central nodule involving both lobes?
T2c despite solitary nodule
What would surgeon do in cancer diagnosed on TURP (T1a-b)?
Needle biopsy to assess cancer in peripheral zone
Check PSA
Radical prostatectomy if young or positive findings in above
GLEASON GRADING
Pattern 1: WC nodule of uniform, single, separate, closely packed glands
Pattern 2: WC nodule of single, seprate but more loosely arranged and less uniform glandsà still can mentally draw circle around contour of each gland
Pattern 3à most common pattern
-Infiltrating between normal glands, marked variation in size and shape, smaller glands than patterns 1 and 2
-Smoothly circumscribed cribriform nodulesà USCAP 2009 says better upgrade to 4
Pattern 4à most important because quite different prognosis from 3
Glands no longer single or separate but form chains, fused acini
Cribriform glands with irregular contours or large cribriform glands
Hyper-nephromatoid pattern
Pattern 5:
No glands at allà single cells, signet rings, cords, sheets, comedonecrosis
What is score associated with WD, MD and PD?
WD: 2-4à never diagnosed on biopsy but ok on TURP
MD: 5-6[2]
PD: 7-10à difference between 3+4 vs 4+3
What to do with 3 grades with highest grade as least common pattern?
Use highest grade as secondary pattern
Example: 3 (70%), 4 (20%), 5 (10%)à 3+5 (not 3+4)
What’s tendency in grading in need biopsy?
Under grade
Tumour progression
Associated with ↑serum PSA
Name features in extraprostatic spread
Perineural invasion
Tumour nodule at the surface of the gland
Tumour in periprostatic soft tissue (adipose)
How to report needle biopsy?
-Must give a separate Gleason score to each core
How many cores are taken?
-10
Why shouldn’t one diagnose Gleason 1-2 on need biopsy?
LG tumors tend to be small and to occur in TZ (unreachable by needles)
PROSTATE GROSSING
TURP
If <12g[3],[4]à submit everything
For every additional 5g, submit 1 cassette
Cancer present, submit in toto
PROSTATECTOMY
Different inks for each side
Amputate seminal vesicles
Thin shave of base resection margin
Submit vas deferens resection margin
Place probe through urethra
Section prostate perpendicular to urethra
Cut each section into quadrants and submit in separate cassettes
Submit upper, mid and lower levels.
Serial section bladder neck and apical margin and submit on edge
NEEDLE BIOPSY REPORT
Number of positive cores
% of cancer in each core
Gleason for each core
Important to report location
PROSTATECTOMY REPORT
Size: include multicentricity
Histologic grade:
Gleason pattern (primary and secondary and total)
Tumour extent:
Extraprostatic extension
Margins: (eg. left apical posterior)
ureters
urethra
AMYLOID
Thioflavin Tà most sensitive for p-component
Non-neoplastic causes of high PSA
BPH
Prostatitis
Prostatic infarct
Not in HGPIN
BLADDER RISK FACTORS
Smokers
Aniline dyes
Male
Schistosomiasis (Egypt, SCC)
Analgesics
Cyclophosphamide
Risk factors for SCC
Shisto
EXtrophy
Lithiasis
Indwelling catheter
Cyclophosphamide
T1 LPà BCG***
T2 MPà cystectomy***
T2a Superficial MP (inner half)
T2b Deep MP (outer half)
T3 Perivesical tissueà still operable???
T4 Nearby organs
N0
N1-3 confined to a single lymph node
N1 <2 cm
N2 2-5 cm
N3 >5 cm
When to upstage?
Detrusorà T2
Perivesicular fatà T3
Organsà T4
Size of tumor in LNà N1-3
Lamina propria invasion
Retraction artifact mimics vascular invasion
Minimal desmoplasia
Note: adipose tissue may be present here
Muscularis propria invasion
in b/w large bundles of muscle
Fat in the biopsy
can have fat within the muscularis (ie. do not over diagnose perivesicular invasion)
SECTIONS TO SUBMIT
Tumour (deepest point, deep margin)
Bladder mucosa (ant,post walls and rt, lt lateral walls)
Ureter margins + lesions
Prostate
Urethral margin
Seminal vesicles
Anterior vaginal wall
Lymph nodes
BLADDER SYNOPTIC REPORT
Specimen type
Tumour site
Tumour size
Histologic type (urothelial, adenoca or squamous)
if urothelial (papillary, non-papillary; invasive, non-invasive, microinvasive <0.2cm)
Histologic grade
Extent of invasion
Mult tumours
Vascular/lymphatic invasion
Margins (ureters, urethra, soft tissue)
Regional nodes
Associated epithelial lesions (papilloma, PUNLMP)
Prostate
Vaginal wall
TCC with sarcomatoid differentiation
Need to ddx from sarcoma
So, sample some more
Try to identify in situ component
CLASSIFY BLADDER TUMOURS
Primary or Metastatic
Primary
Benign
Urothelial: Papilloma, Inverted papilloma,
Squamous: Squamous papilloma, Condyloma accuminatum (papillary arch, koilocytes, (HPV)
Glandular: Villous adenoma
Mesenchymal tumours:
muscle
Neural (paraganglioma)
Vascular
Other (SFT)
Malignant
Urothelial: CIS, PUNLMP, LGTCC, HGTCC, Invasive TCC
Squamous: SCC
Glandular: Adenocarcinoma, Clear cell adenocarcinoma (ddx of nephroblastic adenoma),
Primary or extension from colorectal
Signet ring
Neuroendocrine:
Small cell carcinoma: (pure or combined with TCC or squamous)
Carcinoid
Large cell NE
Mesenchymal tumours:
Muscle (RMS-embyronal, botryoid subtype in kids)
Neural (paraganglioma)
Vascular
Other (SFT)
Lymphoma
Leukemic infiltrate (Myeloid sarcoma)
Melanoma
Remember PSCNà not tumor though
DIFFERENTIALS
Papillary lesions
Nephrogenic adenoma
Condyloma
Villous adenomaà remember
Adenocarcinoma
Metastasis
Polypoid cystitis
TCC
Malignant mimickers
PSCN
IMT
Nephrogenic adenoma
Giant cell cystitis
Von Brunn nests
Cystitis glandularis
Polypoid cystitis
Spindle cell lesions
Postoperative spindle cell nodule
Inflammatory pseudotumor
Sarcomatoid TCC
Metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma
Sarcomas
Carcinosarcoma
SFT