Colon

COLON PATHOLOGY

COLLAGENOUS COLITIS

-Females

-Chronic watery diarrhea and crampy abdominal pain

-Normal endoscopy

Microscopy

-Patchy

-Thickened subepithelial BM>10μm (type I and III) (N<5μm)

-­ Intraepithelial lymphocytes

-LAMINA PROPRIAà plasma cells, eosinophils

Differential diagnosis: tangential sectioning, lymphocytic colitis

 

LYMPHOCYTIC COLITIS

Clinical: watery diarrhea, crampy abdominal pain; normal scope, associated with AI disorders.

Microscopy

-­ Intraepithelial lymphocytes, LAMINA PROPRIA

-Normal architecture

-Surface epithelial degeneration

-No acute inflammation

Treatment: CTSD, sulfasalazine

Differential diagnosis

IBD No INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES, cryptitis, apoptosis
SRUS No INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES
Ischemia No INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES
Lymphoma Tons of INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES
Bowel prep No INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES

 

SOLITARY RECTAL ULCER SYNDROME

-20-30, constipation with difficulty in defecation, blood & mucous

-AbN anorectal floor musculature during defecationà rectal mucosal prolapseà intussusception

Gross: polypà ulcer on anterior or anterolateral wall

Microscopy

-Mucosa: superficial ulceration (pseudomembrane), villiform change, crypt HYPERPLASIA, ectatic capillaries

-LAMINA PROPRIA: fibromuscular HYPERPLASIA with edema, pauci-inflammatory, +/-colitis cystica profunda

-MM: thickened with splayed fibers

Px: responds to bulk laxatives and stool softeners

Differential diagnosis

SRUS Mucinous carcinoma
Rounded mucin pool Infiltrative
No Floating epithelial nests
Bland, simple epithelium Stratified, atypia, complex
No Desmoplasia
Hemorrhage, hemosiderine No
Supporting LAMINA PROPRIA sometimes No

 

DIVERTICULAR DISEASE

Left: mostly sigmoid and can be more proximal but never in rectum (if present, should query coexisting Crohn).

Right: isolated, mid-aged Asians, unrelated to left-sided disease, congenital or acquired

Congenital: all 3 layers of bowel wall (includes Meckel’s diverticulum)

Acquired: lack or have attenuated MP

Microscopy: acute and chronic inflammation+/-granulomas = diverticulitis

Complications: hemorrhage, perforation, diverticulitis, fistula, obstruction

Differential diagnosis: CD

 

ALLERGIC COLITIS

Cause cow’s milk, eggs, soyà infants/kids

Microscopy: rectal biopsy shows mucosal edema, prominent eosinophils (>60 per 10 HYPERPLASIAF)

 

COLITIS CYSTICA PROFUNDA

Microscopy: cysts containing mucus in colonic wall, mucosal prolapse change

Differential diagnosis: mucinous adenocarcinoma

 

ENDOMETRIOSIS OF COLON

Microscopy: endometrial glands, stroma, hemosiderin in deeper layers

 

INFARCTED EPIPLOIC APPENDAGES

-twisting of thick pedicles of fat

-like fat necrosis in the breast

Gross: firm, gray-white nodules resembling metastatic tumor

Microscopy: central infarcted adipose tissue with peripheral fat necrosis and calcification

 

CEROIDOSIS (brown bowel syndrome)

-Associated with severe malabsorption

-Lipofuscin in MP and MM

 

MELANOSIS COLI

-Anthracene-type laxatives

Microscopy: macrophages containing lipofuscin (melanin-like pigment) in LAMINA PROPRIA or deeper in muscle

 

PNEUMATOSIS CYSTOIDES INTESTINALIS PCI

-“A finding, not a diagnosis”

-Both SB and LB

Infants (fulminant): ischemiaà NECà gas-forming bacteriaà PCI

2. Adults (most benign): drugs, chemotherapy, ischemia, C. difficile, COPD, anything leading to increased luminal pressure (diverticular disease,…)

Gross: polypoid grapelike masses

Microscopy: submucosal cysts lined by multinucleated giant cells; mucosa contains cryptitis, crypt abscesses, granulomas

Differential diagnosis

Pseduolipomatosis Fat in LAMINA PROPRIA

 

VASCULAR ECTASIA OF COLON/ANGIODYSPLASIA

-Elderly, 20% of lower GI bleeds

-Right colon and cecum, acquired (associated with aortic stenosis or vWD)

Microscopy: dilated and thin BV in mucosa and submucosa (quite superficial), often with cholesterol emboli. Difficult surgical diagnosis (best by contrast imaging).

DD: colonic varices due to portal HTN

 

XANTHELASMA OF COLON

-Foamy cells without mucin

Negative stains: DPAS, Alcian blue (pH 2.5 or 1.0), mucicarmine

EM: electron-dense globules

Differential diagnosis muciphages (positive mucin stains)

 

ISCHEMIC COLITIS

Etiology

Embolus/thrombus

-Arterial -> thrombosis or embolism

-Venous embolism

Ischemia (ie. hypoperfusion)

Mechanical (eg. volvulus, stricture, herniation)

Distribution

-dependent of vessel involved (ie/ celiac, SMA, IMA)

-transmural: entire thickness

-mural: mucosa and submucosa

-mucosal infarction: mucosa

Gross

-Arterial occlusion: sharply defined

-Venous occlusion: poorly defined

-Serosa: purple-red, small-large ecchymoses

-Wall: edematous, thickened, hemorrhage

-Patchy, serpiginous ulcersà strictures

-Must sample BV

Microscopy

Acute

-Patchy or diffuse

-Superfical coagulative epithelial necrosis (pseudomembrane) with loss of nuclei but preserved deep crypts

-Hemorrhage/hemosiderin in LAMINA PROPRIA

-Look for vasculitis or thrombosis

-Ulceration, transmural necrosis only when severe

-Granulation tissue

-Pauci-inflammatory, no basal plasmacytosis

2. Chronic

-Full-thickness fibrosis (including MP), hemosiderin

Differential diagnosis

IBD Acute: ulceration, transmural, no necrosis, more inflammatory, basal plasmacytosis, lymphoid aggregate, no hemorrhage/hemosiderin

Chronic: fibrosis sparing MP, no hemosiderin

E coli More inflammatory
C difficile More inflammatory

 

RADIATION COLITITIS

-Weeks to years after radiation

Microscopy

-Atrophic mucosa

-Vascular ectasia

-Hyalinized fibrosis

-Atypical FB

-Endothelitisà fibrointimal HYPERPLASIAà occlusion

 

NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS

-Necrotizing inflammation of SB or LB

-Onset within 10days of life in prematures

Gross: necrotic mucosa, submucosal gas-filled cysts

Microscopy: early – mucosal edema, hemorrhage, necrosis, pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis

late – hemorrhagic and gangrenous bowel wall with strictures if patient survives

EOSINOPHILIC GASTROENTERITIS

-Children and young adults

Endoscopy

-Furrow, rings

Ssx

-Malabsorption, diarrhea, bowel obstruction, ascites

Microscopy

-Eosinophils deep in submucosa and MPà diagnosis usually requires resection specimen

-Eosinophils: groupings, cryptitis, crypt abscesses, MP infiltration

-No chronicity change

Differential diagnosis

IBD Crypt distortion, metaplasia
NHD  
Parasites  
Drugs  

 

BOWEL PREPARATION

-Mild increase in mitoses and apoptosis

-Mucin deplEtiologyn

-PMN in surface and crypts

 

ACTIVE COLITIS

Microscopy

-PMN in LAMINA PROPRIA, cryptitis, crypt abscesses

-Irregular luminal border

-Prominent mucin deplEtiologyn

Differential diagnosis

-Diffuse active colitis: UC, infectious

-Focal active colitis: Crohn, bowel preparation, ischemia, NSAIDs, diverticular-associated

Active IBD Infectious Diverticular
Chronic change No chronic change Rectal sparing, only next to divertiula

CHRONIC COLITIS

Microscopy

-Metaplasia (Paneth)

-Crypt distorsion (branching/budding)à careful with mucosa above lymphoid follicles and from lower rectum

-Crypt atrophy (¯ number and shorter because does not touch MM)

-Irregular luminal border

-Basal plasmacytosis

-Fibrosis

-Goblets unaffected

Differential diagnosis

-IBD

-Ischemia

-Radiation

-TB

-Schistosomias

Diagnosis: Clinicalicopathologic

 

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

1. CROHN DISEASE

-HLA DR1/DQw5, white, jews, smokers

Location: throughout GI tract, most common in SB and also in LB with rectal sparing

Symptoms: episodic mild diarrhea, pain

Extraintestinal symptoms:

Arthritis (migratory polyarthritis)

SI

Ank spon

PSC

Erythema Ndosum

Complications: fibrosing strictures; fistulas to bowel, bladder, vagina and perianal skin; protein losing enteropathy, malabsorption, vitB12 deficiency, bile salt malabsorption with steatorrhea, carcinomas (in SB and LB, after 20 years of disease) (SB cancers aggressive but average for LB cancers)

Treatment: steroids, surgery eventually

Gross

-Mucosa: aphthous & linear ulcers, skip lesions (sharp demarcation), cobblestone

-Wall: edema, thickening, fibrosis,

-Serosa: sinus tracts, fistulae, creeping fat

-More right-sided, rectal sparing

Microscopy

1. Mucosa

-Superficial or deep ulcers, crypt abscesses

-Paneth cell and pyloric gland metaplasia

-Features of chronicity

2. Wall

-Non-necrotizing granulomas (poorly formed, next to BV or lymphatics)à need serial sections

-Transmural inflammation with lymphoid aggregates

-Fibrosis of submucosa, m. propria; HYPERPLASIA of m. propria

3. Serosa

-Serositis

-Does disease at anastomosis predict recurrence? No

Dysplasia and carcinoma

Poor prog: long duration and severe disease

 

2. ULCERATIVE COLITIS

Location: rectum, progressing proximally, continuous

Symptoms: relapsing, bloody mucoid diarrhea

Extraintestinal symptoms:

 

Arthritis (migratory polyarthritis)

SI

Ank spon

PSC

Complications: perforation, toxic megacolon, carcinoma, lymphoma

Treatment: steroids, surgery eventually

Gross

-Ulcers, inflammatory pseudopolyps, diffuse continuous disease in LB from rectum proximally (distal worse)

-Backwash ileitis

-No mural thickening, no serositis, no fissuring ulcers, no transmural lymphoid follicles

-Transmural inflammation, fissuring ulcers in fulminant colitits

Microscopy

Mucosa

-Inflammation and ulcers, nf with crypt abscesses

-Ulceration to submucosa

-Features of chronicity

Wall and serosa

-Submucosal fibrosis

Dysplasia and carcinoma

-Fat mucosa, poorly diff. or mucinous ca, high stage

Variants

-Ulcerative proctitis: good prognosis

Poor px: young, length of bowel inv., duration

 

3. INDETERMINATE COLITIS (used in colectomy)

Diagnosis: cannot distinguish between CD and UC

DIVERSION COLITIS

-Stasis, lass of trophic factors in feces (short-chain FA)àerythematous, granular, friable

Microscopy

-Lymphoid follicles

-Crypt abscess

-Mild inflammation

 

CHEMORADIATION

-Same histology for chemotherapy and radiation

Microscopy

Acute (starts within 2 weeks after treatment, subside after 1-2 months)

-Necrosis, ulcer, acute and chronic inflammation

-Large cells, large nuclei, mucin deplEtiologyn, apoptosis

2. Chronic (after acute phase)

-Mucosal atrophy

-Variable fibrosis in submucosa, MP, serosaà can be hyalinized

-Ectatic BV in LAMINA PROPRIA

-Atypical FB and BV

-Vascular changes: fibrointimal HYPERPLASIA, foamy macrophage in walls, hyalinized wall, stenosis

-Others: chronic inflammation, ulcer, stricture, fistula

Differential diagnosis

Chemoradiation Dysplasia
Preserved mucosal architecture  
Atypia beyond carcinoma  
Low or normal N/C  
No mitoses despite apoptosis  
Atypia in FB and BV  
No infiltrative growth  

 

GRANULOMA

-Infectious: viral, bacterial, mycobacterial, fungal, parasitic

-FB: polarize, amyloid

-Vasculitis: Wegener, Giant cell arteritis

-Neoplastic

-IBD

-Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis?

-Idiopathic: sarcoid

 

DYSPLASIA IN IBD (intraepithelial neoplasia)

Clinical: multiple biopsy for flat lesions, precedes cancer almost all

Gross: flat, villous or nodular

Microscopy

Negative for dysplasia

regular surveillance (yearly after 10 years of disease)

LGD: basal nuclei; mild nuclear (enlargement, crowding and hyperchromasia), ¯ intracellular mucin

close surveillance

2. HGD: apical nuclei, loss of polarity, more atypia (darker, more pleomorphic), architecture distortion (villous or nodular) (CIS if cribriform)

colectomy (requires either second opinion or confirmation biopsy)

Indefinite for dysplasia: epithelial changes in a background of active inflammation with regeneration

repeat colonoscopy shortly with aggressive treatment

 

Differential diagnosis

Dysplasia Repair
Large nuclei Same
Dark Same
Mitoses Same
Mucin deplEtiologyn Same
Irregular nuclei Rounded, smooth
Pleomorphic in size Same nuclear size
Basal nuclei for LG but stratified for HG Basal
Loss of polarity No
No Evenly spaced nuclei
Increased Decreased N/C
No Nearby cryptitis/abscess

DALM

-Algorithm…

-Colectomy required even if LG dysplasia

 

 

POLYPS

Classify polyps

-Hamartomatous: lymphoid polyp

-Inflammatory/reactive: mucosal prolapse, inflammatory polyp

-Hyperplastic

-Neoplastic

 

HYPERPLASTIC POLYP

-Rectum mostly, often at top of mucosal folds, can be pedunculated

-Right-sided associated with MSI. >1cm right-sided HYPERPLASIA significant association with CRC

Microscopy

-Serration

-Bland basal nuclei, brush border, mitoses to crypt base (never on surface),

-Mixture of eosinophilic enterocytes and goblets, +/-Paneth

-Crypt cells more crowded with darker nuclei

-Can have invaginated glands (not cancer!)

-Thick subepithelial collagen layer

 

HYPERPLASTIC POLYPOSIS SYNDROME

-≥5HYPERPLASIA proximal to sigmoid, 2 of which ≥1cm or

-Any number in patient with first-degree relative

-≥30HYPERPLASIA of any size throughout colorectum

 

INFLAMMATORY POLYP

Where can you find?

-UC, Crohn, ischemia, amebiasis, schistosomiasis, adjacent to ulcers, adjacent to anastomosis

Why misdiagnosis?

-Can mimicks sarcoma due to bizarre stroma cells (epithelioid, spindle, ganglion-like, multinucleated giants)

Differential diagnosis from malignancy

Inflammatory polyp Malignancy
Rare mitoses  
Never atypical mitoses  
Zonation of bizarre cells  
Small size  

 

SESSILE SERRATED ADENOMA

-exaggerated serration

-crypt branching

-hypermucinous epithelium

-horizontal extension of the crypt base along the m. mucosa

Classification

SERRATED ADENOMA

 

MIXED HYPERPLASIA/ADENOMATOUS POLYP

Gross: small, <1cm

Microscopy: surface epithelial nuclear dysplasia (elongation, increased N/C ratio, nucleoli, atypia) and serration of >20%

 

TUMORS

ADENOMA

Name FIVE steps of adenoma-carcinoma sequence

“First hit”: germline or somatic mutations to:

-APC, mismatch repair genes (MSH2)

2. “Second hit”: methylation/inactivation of normal alIntraepithelial lymphocyteses: APC, B-catenin, MSH2à Adenomas:

Protooncogene mutation: k-ras

Homozygous loss of other tumour suppressor pr-: p53

Carcinoma: many genes

 

Gross morphology of adenoma. Why important?

-Pedunculated, sessile, flat. Flat has 10x HGD

Criteria for flat adenoma

-Flat with height less than half of diameter endoscopically

-Tubular, never thicker than 2x normal epithelial thickness Microscopyscopically. Diagnosis requires endoscopic correlation

Differentiate LG vs HG dysplasia

LG HG
Elongated nuclei Branching, budding, cribriform
  Large dark or vesicular with nucleoli
Basal nuclei, apical mucin Apical nuclei, no mucin
  More mitoses, somestimes necrosis

Define intramucosal vs invasive carcinoma and how to recognize them. Why important?

-Intramucosal: invasion to LAMINA PROPRIAà no metastatic potential

-Invasive: invasion to submucosaà metastatic potential

HGD Cancer
  Desmoplasia
  Infiltrative pattern
  Ulceration

How to report cancer on biopsy?

-Invasive or not

-Grade

-LVI

-Margin: not reportable on piecemeal polypectomy

When polypectomy is curative for invasive cancer in polyp?

-WD-MD

-No LVI

-Negative margin

-2mm from margin?

-Not villous?

Differentiate pseudoinvasion (misplacement)

Pseudoinvasion True
Glands in submucosa are wrapped by LAMINA PROPRIA (LAMINA PROPRIA contains usual inflammatory cells) Glands not wrapped by LAMINA PROPRIA
No Desmoplasia
Cystic dilation and rupture  
Hemorrhage, hemosiderin  
Acellular mucin pool Floating tumor cells in mucin pool
Same degree of dysplasia  

Pathways to colorectal carcinoma

Chromosome instability pathway (adenomaà cancer)

Microscopysatellite instability pathway

MYH pathway

CG island methylation pathwayà imp mech. of inactivating tumor suppressor genes in

 

ADENOCARCINOMA OF COLON

RF?

-Hereditary syndromes, age, UC, Crohn’s, family history

Ssx?

-Right: polypoid exophytic massesà Fe-def anemia w/, weakness and fatigue

-Left: annular lesionsà obstructive symptoms (diarrhea)

-Rectosigmoid tumors: more advanced

Gross?

-Ulcerative, polypoid, infiltrative. Ulcerative more advanced stage usually

Microscopy: well to poorly differentiated tumor cells with marked desmoplasia, mucin prod. inflm NE cells

Grading? Where cutoff?

-20%-60%-80% glands. Also nuclear polarity and uniformity

-PD significantly worse than WD and MD

IHC?

-CK7-/20+, MUC1+/MUC3+, CDX2, hCG, CEA

Variants?

-Adenocarcinoma

-Mucinous

-Signet ring

-Small cell

-Adenosquamous

-Squamous

-Undifferentiated (medullary)

Poor prognostic factors

-Stage, grade, highly infiltrative growth pattern at margin, margins, angiolymphatic & perineural invasion, types (small cell, mucinous, anaplastic or signet ring)

 

 

INDICATIONS FOR GENETIC TESTING

-Kindreds of FAP and HNPCC

-Sporadic cancer satisfying Amsterdam

Amsterdam

1 with CRC <50 of age

2 successive generations

3 relatives with CRC (one first-degree)

-Hints: endometrial cancers

-Only send blood for testing

 

 

MUCINOUS CARCINOMA

What’s special about this tumor Clinicalically?

-Associated with MSI, younger onset, villous adenomas, 2nd to radiation, UC, more in developing countries

-More advanced stage, more extensive peritoneal spread, higher LN+, poorer prognosis

Microscopy?

-Mucinous >50% of tumor mass (floating tumor cells) +/-signet rings

-Often bland morphology

 

MEDULLARY/UNDIFFERENTIATED CARCINOMA

Genetics and behavior?

-Strongly associated with MSI-H but no/few nodal metastasesà better prognosis

-Sporadic or associated with HNPCC

Microscopy

-Expansive sheets of cells

-No or minimal mucin production

-No tubule formation

-Lymphocytic infiltration

-Uniform, small to medium-sized, round, nucleoli, lots of mitoses

Positive IHC: CK, CEA, EMA

Negative IHC: NE markers, MLH1, MSH2

Differential diagnosis for ugly tumors in bowels. Workup?

Primary carcinoma  
Primary sarcoma  
Primary NE  
Lymphoma  
Melanoma  

-Don’t forget EM

 

SIGNET RING CARCINOMA

-Poor prognosis

Microscopy

-Diffuse growth of signet ring cells with little glandular formation (>50% of tumor cells)

 

SMALL CELL CARCINOMA

-Poor prognosis

Microscopy

-Same as small cell NE carcinoma of lung

IHC: NSE, syn, chrA

EM: few dense-core secretory granules

 

RECTAL CANCER AFTER NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Microscopy? How to find tumor cells?

-Often just acellular mucin pools, inflammation and fibrosis.

-Use CK for tumors in tissue and also LN

How to report tumor size?

-Extent of mucin pools and fibrosis

 

GIST

-Interstitial cells of Cajal (pacemaker cells)

-By definition, CD117+ except few negative due to improper fixation, inadequate sampling, prior Gleevec treatment.

-50-70, equal except in Carney complex (parachondrogist, multiple, strikingly young females)

Genetics

-c-kit (transmembrane TK) OR PDGFR-α mutationsàauto-phosphorylationà signalling cascadeà altered cell proliferation and differentiation

Risk level

-Benign: <2cm, <5/50

-Borderline: in between

-Malignant: >5cm, >5/50

Treatment: Gleevec (imatinib) inhibits ABL, BCR-ABL, KIT, PDGFR. Only CD117+ by IHC responds to it; what about PDGFR+?

Gross: WC, intramural, fish-flesh, hemorrhage, necrosis, cystic softening

Microscopy

-Epithelioid: rounded cells, clear-eosinophilic cytoplasm, sheet but sometimes in nests

-Spindle (20%): interlacing fascicles, cigar-shaped, vesicular nuclei, sometimes palisading, less eosinophilic than adjacent SM, juxtanuclear cytoplasmic vacuoles in 5%

-Skenoid fibers (extracellular collagen globules)

Positive stains: CD117, CD34

Negative stains: desmin, actins

Diagnosis: C-KIT screening test

EM: long interdigitating cytoplasmic processes, intercellular junctions, dense core granules

Differential diagnosis of all GI spindle cell tumors

Inflammatory fibroid polyp Zonation, CD34+, SMA+
Schwannoma Diffuse S100+
Fibromatosis SMA+, CD117-
IMT ALK+, SM markers-, S100-
GIST CD117+, CD34+, SMA+, desmin-
GANT CD117+. EM: neuron-like cells with neurosecretory granules
SM tumors SMA+, desmin+
Kaposi  
Melanoma  

 

APPENDIX

NORMAL

-Same 4 layers as gut

-Histologically similar to LB

-LAMINA PROPRIAà irregularly distributed crypts (glands)

-Rich lymphoid tissue in mucosa and submucosa

 

GROSSING

-Longitudinal serial sections of 1cm tip (in toto basically)

-2 cross sections from mid and proximal portions (always include resection margin)

 

INFLAMMATION

ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Clinical: young adults with periumbilical to RLQ pain, N&V, fever, ↑WBC

Gross: fibrinopurulent exudate on serosa, perforation, fecalith

Microscopy

Early: focal PMN collections in lumen and LAMINA PROPRIA

Later: erosion, cryptitis, crypt abscess, PMN in wall

Late: granulation, xanthogranulomatous

-Concomittant Actinomyces

-Large amount of eosinophils suggests appendiceal involvement by eosinophilic GE

 

INFECTIONS

1. ENTEROBIUS VERMICULARIS

Clinical, pinworm, ages 7-11, incidental

Microscopy: narrow lateral cuticular alae; causes granulomas

 

2. YERSINIA

3. SCHISTOSOMIA

TUMORS

FIBROUS OBLITERATION

-Not secondary to appendicitis

Gross: white tip

Microscopy

-Spindle cells and myxoid component

-Neuronal and NE cell proliferation

IHC: S100, chr, NSE

Differential diagnosis

NE hyperplasia Carcinoid
  Definite insular growth with extension to muscular wall
  Gross nodule

 

INFLAMMATORY MYOFIBROBLASTIC TUMOR

FIBROMATOSIS

IDIOPATHIC RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS

 

Name the different types of mucous lesions in the appendix

Simple mucocele

Hyperplastic polyp / mucinous hyperplasia

Mucinous cystadenoma

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma

 

MUCOCELE

-Dilated lumen filled with mucous

Causes:

-Mucinous HYPERPLASIA (looks like hyperplastic polyp)

-Mucinous cystadenoma

-Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma

-Obstruction of the appendix (eg. fecolith, tumour)

 

HYPERPLASTIC POLYP/MUCINOUS HYPERPLASIA

-Looks like colonic hyperplastic polyp

 

MUCINOUS CYSTADENOMA

-Intestinal type epithelium w/ minimal atypia

 

MUCINOUS CYSTADENOCARCINOMA

-Like ovarian mucinous tumor

-Associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei, particularly if ruptures

Gross: resembles cystadenoma

Microscopy:

-Complex papillary fronds

-Stratification

-Destructive invasion wall

 

PSEUDOMYXOMA PERITONEI

-extravasation of mucin into abdominalmen

-thought to be clonally derived from associated mucinous tumor, usually of appendix

-also assoc/ ovarian mucinous tumors (thought to be met. from appx or GI)

 

ANUS

POLYPS

INFLAMMATORY CLOACOGENIC POLYP

Microscopy

-Mucosal prolapse change

 

CARCINOID

-Associated with Meckel’s, AIG, ZEN

Px: metastases, size

Stomach: AIG, ZEN, sporadic,

Small intestine: depth of invasion, location in small intestine

Appendix: >2 cm, mesoappendix invasion

goblet cell carcinoid = poorer prog

Rectum: >2 cm, invasion of muscularis propria, mitoses, angiolymphatic invasion, anaplasia

 

1. ESOPHAGUS

Very rare

Microscopy: nests, islands and trabeculae of uniform cells, may have Paneth cell differentiation

 

2. STOMACH

Clinical:

Types

-ECL carcinoids

I (no1) II III (no2)
AIG ZES Sporadic
About 50 of age
2.5x in F Equal 3x in M
Body, LVI possible Parietal cell HYPERPLASIA Anywhere
Favorable (regress with antrectomy) Intermediate if sporadic; bad if MEN1 Poor
    Malignat if >2cm, myoinvasion, LVI

-Gastrinomaà antrum

Gross: look like polyps

Microscopy

-Acinar, insular, trabecular

-≥5mm

Treatment: antrectomy, tumor resection

 

3. SMALL INTESTINE

Clinical: assoc/ MEN, ZES, sporadic

-assoc/ carcinoid syndrome if liver mets present

Treatment: surgical excision of tumor and regional lymph nodes, excise solitary liver metastases

5 year survival: 50-65% (85% if confined to bowel wall vs. 5% if serosal invasion)

Gross: submucosal, can ulcerate

-bright yellow after formalin fixation

Microscopy: arch: insular (nests), acinar, trabecular

duodenum jejunoileal
<2cm >2cm
indolent aggressive
muc/submucosa muc/submucosa
somatistatinomas(periampullary with psam. bodies) serotonin-prod
gastrinoma gastrinoma

Location: ileum>jejunum> duodenum

 

4. APPENDIX

-No1 tumor here, often at tip

-Sporadic

Gross: tip, < 1 cm; gray or yellow, firm, intramural nodule

Microscopy:

insular (nests)

trabecular

adenocarcinoid

tubular

goblet cell (mucicarmine, PAS-D, Alcian Blue)

Treatment

Appendectomy: if < 1cm

Indications for right hemicolectomy:

>2 cm

2. positive margin

3. mesoappendiceal spread

What about goblet cell carcinoid?

Poor prog: >2 cm, mesoappendix invasion

goblet cell carcinoid (mucicarmine, CEA +)

 

5. RECTUM

Clinical: most common site of colonic carcinoid

-assoc/ ovarian carcinoid, Crohn (multiple), UC (multiple)

Poor prog.: >2 cm, invasion of muscularis propria, mitoses, angiolymphatic invasion, anaplasia

Treatment: local excision; partial colectomy if have malignant potential (see above)

Gross: <5mm

Microscopy: insular, trabecular

 

CARCINOID SYNDROME

-Caused by liver mets, ovary and lung primaries (all bypass portal venous system)

“Biologically active substances” released→ serotonin, tachykinin, bradykinin, histamine, prostaglandins

Clinical: flushing, hypertension, sweating, palamina propriaitations

Gross: fibrosclerosis of RV +TV/PV “carcinoid heart disease”, tumour itself

Microscopy: smooth muscle cells + mucopolysaccharide matrix

Why only right-side of heart?

-5-HT and bradykinin are degraded by monoamine oxidases in the pulmonary circulation

Why only liver mets?

-bioactive substances released into the portal system and therefore not degraded by the liver

 

ENTEROPATHY-ASSOCIATED T-CELL LYMPHOMA (ulcerative jejunoileitis)

Ssx

-Malabsorption, perforation, hemorrhage, pain, fever

Microscopy

-Villous atrophy

-Low threshold for ordering TCR rearrangement analysis

 

AMYLOID

-Common

Diagnosis

-Abdominalminal fat or rectal biopsy

Microscopy

-AL: BV walls and MP

-AA: mostly in LAMINA PROPRIA and BV walls

 

GROSSING

COLECTOMY

1. “Make sure the name and unique number match on the requisition and bucket.”

2.  Sample the following areas (going through the TNM stages):

Polyps

-section through surgical margin of stalk

-in toto

 

Colectomy – tumor

-can remove mesentery and dissect lymph nodes while fresh

-can do fat digestion in alcohol

-open bowel (don’t cut through tumor) and pin overnight to fix

 

Sections:

Tumor deepest point of invasion

IBD: section every 10cm

Resection Margins

Proximal

Distal

Radial margin

Lymph nodes

peritumoral

proximal to tumor

distal to tumor

 

Representative sections

bowel

anorectal junction

subserosal connective tissue

 

STAGING

COLON

Difference with other GI tumors?

-Tis: carcinoma in situ (intraepithelial or invasion of LAMINA PROPRIA)
-T1: tumor invades submucosa only

4 margins?

-2 ends, radial, peritoneal (only valid if tumor on peritoneal surface or ulcerated surface or reactive mesothelials with tumors close to, but not at, serosal surface)

Node numbers? Minimal number?

-N1: ≥1, N2: ≥4 (remember 1, 4)

-12 but more LN will increase predictive probability

How to sample margins?

­-Must do longitudinal sections if tumor close to margins. Otherwise, en face acceptable

Define positive radial margin and why so important?

-≤1mm. Because postoperative adjuvant therapy needed

LN equivalent?

-Tumor found in fat but with form and smooth contour of LN

-If irregular, should be classified in T category

Current standpoint for Microscopymetastasis?

-Not considered standard of care. So no need to stain with CK

How many sections needed to assess depth of invasion?

-At least 3

 

REST OF GI TRACT

TX: cannot be assessed

T0: no primary tumour

Tis: carcinoma in situ (intraepithelial only)
T1: tumor in LAMINA PROPRIA OR submucosa

T2: tumor invades MP

T3: tumor invades through MP into the subserosa

T4a: tumor directly invades other organs

T4b: perforates visceral peritoneum

 

Note: pT4 (serosal involvement) includes (a) tumor close to or at, serosal surface due to mesothelial inflammatory or HYPERPLASIA reaction

 

Regional lymph nodes (N)

NX: cannot be assessed

N0: none

N1: 1-3

N2: 4+

Classify tumour nodule as:

lymph node: if form and smooth contour of a lymph node

tumour: if irregular contour

 

Notes: 12-15 lymph nodes are required for accurate staging

 

Distant Metastasis (M)

MX: distant metastasis cannot be assessed

M0: no distant metastasis

M1: distant metastasis

 

SYNOPTIC REPORT

COLORECTAL CARCINOMA

Tumor extent: depth of invasion (TNM stages)

Lymph nodes: sentinel, non-sentinel

Margins: proximal, distal, radial

 

Host response

Perforation

Pre-existing polyp

TNM stage

HEREDITARY

FAP (Classic)

When all get cancer?

-~100% adenocarcinoma by age 50

Inheritance, genetics, mechanism?

-AD. APC mutation on 5q. Tumour suppressor geneà non-functional APC cannot bind b-cateninà b-catenin binds to Tcf-Lef proteinsà proliferation and anti-apoptosis

Diagnostic criteria

>100 colorectal polyps (not always adenoma!)

Germline APC mutation

Family history of APC

At least one of following: epidermoid cyst, osteoma or desmoid tumor

GI tumors

-Stomach: FGP, adenomas

-SB: adenomas

-GI: adenomas

Extracolonic tumours

-Fibroma, supernumerary teeth, congenital hypertrophy of retinal pigment epithelium

-Gardner’s syndrome: periampullary adenocarcinoma, lymphoid polyps of ileum, cancers of thyroid and adrenals + extraGI lesions (desmoid tumors, epidermoid cyst, osteoma)

-Turcot’s syndrome: + medulloblastoma

Microscopy: adenomas, may have adenomatous flat epithelium

AFAP (Attenuated)

What genetic difference?

-MAPC mutation on 5q, on exon 9 (both 5’ and 3’ ends)

-Also mutations to MYH (base excision repair gene)

Gross difference? Onset difference?

-Flat, plaque-like, >100, right colon

-Cancer 15yrs later than FAP but 10yrs earlier than sporadic

HNPCC

Define MSI-H. Name all MMR

-Loss of ≥2 MMR markers

-MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2, MSH6

Onset?

-~45yrs.

Genetics

-MLH1, MSH2, PMS1/2 mutationsà MSI (expansion or contraction of tandem repeats of 1-4 nucleotides)

Extracolonic? “CEO”

-Cholangiocarcinoma

-Endometrial carcinoma

-Ovarian

Amsterdam criteria?

-3 members (one must be 1st degree)

-2 successive generations

-1 under 50

Bethesda criteria?

-Steinberg p1573

Microscopy

-Right-sided

-Undifferentiated (medullary)

-Signet ring differentiatino

-Lymphocytic infiltration

-Mucinous differentiation

-No dirty necrosis

Prognosis compared to sporadic?

-Paradoxically better prognosis despite uglier tumors

IHC: hMLH1, hMSH2à loss of staining suggests mutation in gene with additional DNA testing for MSI expansion/contraction

What’s Muir-Torre?

-HNPCC+sebaceous tumors

COWDEN’S SYNDROME

-AD

Features

-Multiple GI hamartomas including in stomachà no malignant potential

-Risk of breast and thyroid cancers

-Trichilemmomas, acral keratoses, oral papillomatosis

Microscopy

-LAMINA PROPRIA divided into lobules by SM from MM (~PJ polyps or SRUS)

Genetics: PTEN mutations in 70%

Differential diagnosis: Peutz-Jeghers

JUVENILE POLYPOSIS SYNDROME

Locations?

-Rectum>>> SB, stomach

Inheritance?

-Sporadic or AD

Diagnostic criteria?

->5 colorectal juvenile polyps

-Juvenile polyps in entire GI tract

-Any polyps in patient with family history of JPS

Sessile or pedunculated? Cut surface?

-Peduculated (sessile is rare). Cysts

Microscopy?

-Eroded surface with reactive and regenerative epithelium

-Cystically-dilated glands

-Prominent stroma with mixed inflammatory infiltrate (granulation tissue stroma)

Any cancer risk?

-Considered non-neoplastic if solitaryà therefore, no risk

-30-40% CRC if syndromic. Cancer can be in colon, stomach and pancreas

Name 2 genetic mutations?

-SMAD4, PTEN muations

PEUTZ-JEGHERS SYNDROME

-AD, incomplete penetrance, most diagnosed at 20 of age

Genetic mutation?

-STK11

Diagnostic criteria?

-≥3 PJ polyps or

-Any combo of 2 elements of following: any number of PJ polyps, family history, mucocutaneous pigmentation

Sessile or pedunculated?

-Large, lobulated, pedunculated polyps resembling adenomatous polyps

Microscopy?

-Epithelium of HYPERPLASIA + arborizing SM

-Surface regenerative changes with erosion

-Invagination possible

Cancers in which organs? What surveillance?

-95% overall cancer risk

GI: colon, pancreas, stomach

2. Breast: very high

Gyn: ovary (sex cord tumors with annular tubules), cervix (adenoma malignanum), testis (Sertoli cell tumors)

TURCOT

Genetics for both variants and tumors?

-AD

HMPCC FAP
No polyps Polyps
GBM Medulloblastoma

GANGIONEUROMA

SB and LB

Forms

Solitary

Ganglioneuromatous polyps

Diffuse ganglioneuromatosis (with NF1, MEN2b)

Microscopy

 

CRONKITE-CANADA

Inheritance:

Nonhereditary

Manifestations?

Alopecia, nail atrophy, skin hyperpigmentation

What’s special about onset compared to other genetic disorders?

Late after 50

Microscopy

Same as JP

Cancer risk?

Very rare

REPORT COLON

CAUSES OF FEWER LYMPH NODE THAN EXPECTED

Unusual patient with fewer LN (least likely possibility)

Neo-adjuvant therapy

Surgeons fail to remove enough tissue

Pathologists fail to find LN

Comments are closed.